I wouldn't. I don't think even the most anti-Obama person out there really believes this either. Huh? Do you really think that allowing judges to set aside guilty verdicts or reduce sentences has anything to do with the violence in this case? Frankly, this post is as big a non-sequitor as comedian Jay Mohr's recent pronouncement that the Second Amendment is somehow responsible for the terror attacks. Why don't we wait to find out who the person is, first, before we start politicizing the tragedy.